They

Previous entries (2026-05-14 and 2026-05-15) incorrectly conflated "iAds Social Project" (aff_id 1008463) with iAds the publisher. This is wrong: - **"iAds Social Project"** is a Publisher Growth publisher managed by Sam Yap (Enterprise PG). The "iAds" in its name is misleading — it has zero operational connection to iAds as a publisher. - **iAds** is a publisher on Involve Asia's platform managed by Andrew Tay — they send traffic to platform offers just like any other publisher. - Sam's ISP and iAds publisher are unrelated entities. They both send traffic to the same platform offers (Shein, Trip, Klook, Oppo ID) but that's coincidental — any publisher can target those offers. - **Validation pipeline** is Group Services (Wing Loon), not iAds. Corrected diagnosis: Sam Yap manages an ISP publisher that is firing 3.5k clicks/day with zero conversions on Shein, Trip, Klook, Oppo ID. This is a PG ops issue — publisher traffic quality or postback misconfiguration. Nothing to do with Andrew Tay or iAds.

AG (Advertiser Growth) account managers OWN the offers driving network revenue — they are the manager-side view of the same revenue stream that rolls up as "Group Revenue". Surfacing "AG Team Revenue" and "Group Revenue" as separate sparklines on the home page (or as separate lines in the brief) is double-counting. They differ only in slice: - **Group Revenue** = total MYR across all offers, network-wide. Slice axis: time. - **AG Revenue (`ag_revenue_split`)** = the SAME total, sliced by account manager (Mona Surach, Kum Phui Lam, Rizky Saputra, MJ Legaspi, Mini Nguyen, Advertiser Solutions). Slice axis: manager. When citing platform revenue, use Group Revenue. When citing per-manager performance, use the AG split. Never juxtapose the two as if they were independent series — they're the same money. The brief may cite both *only* when explicitly walking from network → manager-level attribution.